Osama Bin Laden
03 May 2011

OSAMA BIN LADEN was undoubtedly a cold-blooded murderer. Originally trained and funded by the CIA in its efforts to create as strong resistance movement to the original Soviet occupation of Afghanistan, Bin Laden was cast as the bogeyman in the 9-11 false-flag operation in order to justify invasion and occupation of countries in the Middle East.

Here are just four documentaries out of many showing some of the holes in the official version of 9-11:

Loose Change 911: An American Coup

War by Deception 2011: The Shadow Government and Shadow Economy

Conspiracy Theory with Jesse Ventura: 9/11: The Pentagon

9-11 Rare Live Footage Proof of Explosions

And there are now thousands scientists and architects that have joined organisations to show their rejection of the official story of what happened on that terrible day, including:

https://www.ae911truth.org/ Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth

https://911scholars.org/ Scholars for 9/11 Truth

https://www.journalof911studies.com/ Journal of 9/11 Studies

And here is a scientific paper proving that a powerful and unusual explosive called thermate was found in the rubble of the World Trade Centre.

You just cannot read the above material without having at least some doubt in your mind in the official story because there are undeniably so many problems with it. But then the idea that parts of the US government may have been involved in the mass-murder of their own citizens is so alarming and unsavory, especially for Americans, that it is much easier to buy the fairy tale and celebrate the murder of Osama Bin Laden.

Of course, Bin Laden was a mass murderer. He is strongly implicated in the 1998 US Embassy bombings in East African cities. But there has never been proof of his involvement in 9-11… because he wasn't involved. So the US celebration in the killing of Bin Laden is short-sighted at best.

This raises another interesting point: he wasn't, but if Bin Laden had been involved in 9-11, would celebration of his death be justified?

Personally, I find the celebration of death to be abhorrent and do not support the "eye for an eye" Neanderthal mentality. If we celebrate the murder of murderers, then we exhibit the very same consciousness of those murderers, and the cycle perpetuates. As Ghandi rightly said, "An eye for an eye makes the whole world blind." There will be reprisals to the murder of Bin Laden, to which we will no doubt seek further revenge, and the world will undoubtedly become a more dangerous place for everybody. The most sensible thing to do would be to stop this vicious circle, but that would take real courage. It is just so much easier and initially satisfying to strike back rather than find a way of ending animosity.

Even those who profess to be Christian, the vast majority of America, will know God's commandment "Thou shalt not kill." And yet, these "religious" American's are celebrating murder?!

It is also interesting that this news of the murder of Osama Bin Laden has come out at a time when Obama's birth certification issue is so prominent (the scan put out was clearly a fake) and when his credibility is so low. Notice of his murder is just what the US government needs to gain a little more credibility. Bin Laden may not have even been killed — there are reports he died back in 2002 — but this does not stop such news being manufactured for political ends.

But would governments put out false information for political manipulation? Of course!! That has been the modus operandi of governments from time immemorial! We would be extremely naive if we trust information that our governments control and release, especially if it is in their interest.



It appears that Osama Bin Laden was unarmed when he was captured by the Navy Seals and shot in the head. Why would the US not want to bring him to justice for his terrible crimes? This is because if the US administration tried Bin Laden in a proper court of law for his role in planning 9-11, they would not only have too little evidence on which to convict him, but much more importantly, they would be opening the door to a proper public investigation into the events leading up to 9-11 — not something you want to do if 9-11 was a false-flag operation!

That said, there may well be enough evidence against Bin Laden for the African embassy bombings and he should have stood trial for those.